Triangulasi dan Analisis Domain; Meningkatkan Kredibilitas dan Kedalaman Penelitian Kualitatif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51135/kambotivol6issue1page33-41Keywords:
Analisis Domain, Kualitatif, TriangulasiAbstract
This study explores the synergistic relationship between triangulation and domain analysis and how their integration can improve the overall quality of qualitative research. Triangulation enhances trustworthiness by validating findings through comparisons of data collected from multiple sources, methods, or investigators. Meanwhile, domain analysis, rooted in ethnographic semantics, offers a systematic way to uncover the meaning and structure embedded in the validated data. When applied together, these two approaches enable researchers to generate findings that are both credible and rich in interpretation. Triangulation addresses issues of reliability and bias, ensuring that conclusions are supported by diverse evidence. Domain analysis then deepens understanding by identifying semantic relationships and constructing relevant cultural or conceptual domains directly from participants’ perspectives. This study employs a Narrative Literature Review method to synthesize theoretical and methodological insights, building a conceptual link between methodological rigor and interpretative depth. The results are expected to provide guidance for researchers in improving credibility, dependability, and confirmability in qualitative research. Overall, integrating triangulation and domain analysis offers a strong foundation for producing meaningful and trustworthy interpretations, thereby contributing to both methodological strengthening and theoretical development in qualitative inquiry.
References
Anderson, J. (2024). Translanguaging: A paradigm shift for ELT theory and practice. ELT Journal, 78(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad057
Booth, A., Noyes, J., Flemming, K., Moore, G., Tunçalp, Ö., & Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Formulating questions to explore complex interventions within qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Global Health, 4(Suppl 1), e001107. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001107
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. HUMANIKA, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
Hidir, A. (2002). Metode Etnografi: Sebuah Varian Kualitatif. Pusbangdik Universitas Riau.
Hidir, Achmad, Rahman Malik, & Dyah Widiarti. (2024). Pengantar Sosiologi. Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.
Kawar, L. N., Dunbar, G. B., Aquino-Maneja, E. M., Flores, S. L., Squier, V. R., & Failla, K. R. (2024). Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, and Triangulation Research Simplified. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 55(7), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20240328-03
McLellan, E., MacQueen, K. M., & Neidig, J. L. (2003). Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. Field Methods, 15(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239573
Mekarisce, A. A. (2020). Teknik Pemeriksaan Keabsahan Data pada Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Kesehatan Masyarakat. JURNAL ILMIAH KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT : Media Komunikasi Komunitas Kesehatan Masyarakat, 12(3), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.52022/jikm.v12i3.102
Misno, Abd., & Arafah, Muh. (2021). Pengembangan Model Analisis Data Kualitatif Untuk Penelitian Ekonomi Syariah Menggunakan Maqashid Syariah. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Tsarwah, 4(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.30863/al-tsarwah.v4i1.1627
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a Qualitative Document Analysis. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton,M.Q. (2020). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publication. https://consensus.app/search/patton-m-q-2020-qualitative-research-evaluation-me/JMJ2nncGSCOOFDV94RsaGQ/
Rodgers, B. L., & Cowles, K. V. (1993). The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Research in Nursing & Health, 16(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770160309
Rukhmana, T., Darwis, D., & Alatas, R. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. CV Rey Media Grafika.
Russell, B. H. (2017). Research Methods in Anthropology Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Smit, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2018). Observations in Qualitative Inquiry: When What You See Is Not What You See. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918816766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918816766
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Spradley, J.P. (2019). Observasi Partisipan. https://www.waveland.com/browse.php?t=689
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 KAMBOTI: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
